Difficulties encountered in the diagnosis of primary esophageal malignant melanoma by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a case report
Case Report

Difficulties encountered in the diagnosis of primary esophageal malignant melanoma by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a case report

Yang Tang1#, Maoyan Jiang2#, Xianwen Hu2, Cheng Chen1, Qi Huang2

1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China; 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence to: Dr. Cheng Chen. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, 149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi 563003, China. Email: 29217036@qq.com; Prof. Qi Huang. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, 149 Dalian Road, Huichuan District, Zunyi 563003, China. Email: huangqi001@sina.com.

Abstract: Primary malignant melanoma of the gastrointestinal mucosa is a rare tumor. Here, we report a case of a 60-year-old female patient with esophageal malignant melanoma. Combined with the related literature, the clinical manifestations, imaging, histopathological and immunohistochemical features of primary esophageal malignant melanoma were observed and analyzed. Imaging examination with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) revealed multiple metastases in the patient’s skull, bilateral acetabular, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes, but no radioactive uptake in the primary lesion. Endoscopy showed an area of abnormal pigmentation measuring approximately 0.8 cm in diameter in the lower esophageal mucosa, which was confirmed by pathological biopsy as primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus. The tumor cells are large, round, and diffused in sheets and nests, with visible nucleoli, thick chromatin granules, and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm; melanin granules can be seen in the cytoplasm. The immune phenotype was as follows: tumor cells had diffuse expression of HMB45, Melan A, and S100. Diagnosing esophageal malignant melanoma using 18FDG-PET/CT imaging presents some difficulties, and new radio-targeted tracers need to be further developed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this method. The combination of a morphological examination, pathological examination, and immunohistochemistry is helpful for diagnosing primary esophageal malignant melanoma.

Keywords: Esophagus; malignant melanoma; positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT); case report


Submitted Feb 12, 2021. Accepted for publication Apr 21, 2021.

doi: 10.21037/apm-21-649


Introduction

Melanomas are malignant tumors that develop from melanocytes. Most melanomas originate in the skin; however, a handful of melanomas occurring in mucous membranes have been reported. Melanomas are composed of epithelioid cells arranged in nests or spindle cells arranged in bundles (1). The presence of a small number of melanocytes in the squamous epithelium may be a precursor to melanoma.

Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus (PMME) is a rare tumor, accounting for less than 0.5% of esophageal tumors, with variable pathology and cytology. PMMEs mostly occur in people over the age of 60 years, and males are more susceptible than females to developing this disease. Approximately 70% of PMMEs are located in the middle and lower thirds of the esophagus (2), which may be associated with a higher accumulation of melanin in these regions. Risk factors for PMME include familial genetic history, immunosuppression, multiple atypical nevi, history of melanoma, sensitivity to sunlight, and radiation exposure (3). However, due to the rarity of PMME, relevant epidemiological data are lacking, and the pathogenesis and molecular biological characteristics of this malignancy have not been clarified.

The diagnosis and treatment of PMME are challenging and require extensive investigation by clinicians with relevant expertise. PMME is prone to misdiagnosis as esophageal leiomyoma, esophageal cancer, or other common esophageal diseases. Owing to PMME having a low degree of differentiation, most patients have already entered the middle or advanced stage at the time of diagnosis (4), resulting in a poor prognosis.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is currently considered to be the most sensitive method for the identification of metastatic lesions of solid tumors. Metabolic information provided by PET combined with CT anatomic images improves the diagnosis, staging, and treatment evaluation of tumors, and has a huge impact on patient management (5).

In this article, we present the case of a patient with PMME who underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG)-PET/CT imaging, which showed multiple metastases in the skull, bilateral acetabulum, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes, but no radio-uptake in the primary esophageal lesion.

We present the following article in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-649).


Case presentation

The patient, a 60-year-old female, visited the hospital after experiencing pain on the right side of the head for 1 month. Physical examination showed no obvious nodule pigmentation or skin lesions, nor was any palpable lymph node enlargement observed in the body. Laboratory test values and tumor markers were within the normal range. Brain MRI showed an abnormal nodular signal in the right frontal bone. Subsequent chest CT examination revealed no significant abnormalities (Figure 1). Pelvic MRI revealed nodular edema in the bone marrow of the bilateral acetabulum (Figure 2).

Figure 1 MRI of the patient’s head. Brain MRI images showing nodules with high-intensity signal on T2-weighted imaging (A) and isosignal on T1-weighted imaging (B) in the right frontal bone (black arrow), which show obvious enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI images (C: axial; D: coronal). MRI, magnetic resonance image.
Figure 2 MRI results of the patient’s hip. Two nodular areas with high-intensity signals on T2-weighted imaging in the right acetabulum [black arrows in (A) and (B)]. A circular shadow with high signal intensity is seen in the left acetabulum on T2-weighted imaging [orange arrow in (B)]. MRI, magnetic resonance image.

Based on the above results, multiple metastases were highly suspected by the clinician. Subsequently, the patient underwent FDG-PET/CT full-body imaging at the doctor's order. Figure 3 presents 18FDG-PET/CT images. The images showed lesions with high metabolic uptake in the right frontal bone, bilateral acetabulum, bilateral cervical lymph nodes, and rectum, which were considered to be malignant lesions; however, it was unclear which of the lesions was the primary tumor. As the lesions in the frontal bone, bilateral acetabular, and cervical lymph node were not suspected as being primary lesions, the patient underwent digital rectal examination and colonoscopy, which found no abnormalities. This presented a dilemma for the treating physicians in giving the patient a clear diagnosis, and they subsequently decided to organize a multidisciplinary consultation. It was ultimately agreed that the patient should undergo extensive gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Figure 3 The whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT images of this patient. (A) 18F-FDG PET/CT image showing nodular hyper-radioactive uptake in a lesion in the right frontal bone (black arrow). (B) A hyper-radiogenic spot (black arrow) in the right acetabular bone. (C) Nodules of high radioactive uptake can be seen in the right acetabular bone (black arrow), and small areas of slight radioactive uptake can be seen in the left acetabular bone (red arrow). (D) False positive focal hyper-radioactive uptake can be seen in the rectal mucosa (red arrow). (E) PET/CT maximum-intensity-projection images showing bilateral cervical lymph node enlargement with increased radioactive uptake (black arrows) and nodular areas of increased radioactive uptake in the bilateral acetabulum (red arrow); no obvious abnormal radioactive uptake is visible in other body parts. 18F-FDG PET/CT, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

The patient underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy. Under the narrow band imaging mode of the duodenoscope, pigmentation was observed in the mucosa of the lower esophageal segment (Figure 4). The pigmented area in the esophagus measured approximately 0.8 cm and had a discernible boundary. The intrapapillary capillary loop was classified as B1, and a biopsy was taken for analysis. Additionally, a small amount of pigmentation could be seen at the duodenal papilla, and hyperemic edema was found in the mucosa of the gastric antrum, but no ulcer or mass was present. The duodenal papilla was swollen and dark brown with dilated blood vessels on the surface, and a biopsy was taken for analysis. No other abnormalities were found in the mucosa of the duodenal bulb or the upper descending segment.

Figure 4 The duodenoscopy results of the patient. Pigmentation of the mucosa in the lower esophagus seen under duodenoscopy (arrow).

The tissues extracted by endoscopic biopsy were stained with hematoxylin-eosin, which suggested a malignant phenotype (Figure 5A). Immunohistochemical staining showed positivity for S-100 (Figure 5B), human melanoma black (HMB)-45 (Figure 5C), and Melan-A (Figure 5D), as well as Ki-67 positivity in 30% of cells. Based on all morphological and functional examination results, and after the exclusion of skin pigmentation nodules, the patient was finally diagnosed with PMME with duodenal, skull, bilateral hip, and bilateral neck lymph node metastases. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Figure 5 Histopathological features and immunohistochemical staining of primary esophageal malignant melanoma. (A) Hematoxylin-eosin staining images (×100). The tumor cells are large, round, and diffused in sheets and nests, with visible nucleoli, thick chromatin granules, and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm; melanin granules can be seen in the cytoplasm. (B) Immunohistochemical image showing positive staining for S-100 (×100). (C) Immunohistochemical image showing strongly positive staining for human melanoma black (HMB)-45 (×100). (D) Immunohistochemical image showing positive staining for Melan-A (×100). HMB, anti-human melanoma monoclonal antibody; Melan-A, melanoma specific antibodies.

Discussion

Accounting for roughly only 0.5% of esophageal tumors (6), PMME is a rare tumor originating from melanocytes in the neural crest. The existence of melanocytes in the basal layer of the esophageal mucosa and the junction between the epithelium and the stroma forms the basis of PMME. Although the pathogenesis of this malignancy is not clear, it may be related to factors such as gastric acid reflux, long-term repeated inflammatory stimulation, ethnicity, and familial inheritance. Chronic esophagitis and local esophageal epithelial melanocytosis may be precancerous lesions of PMME (7). In the early stage, patients with PMME experience no obvious clinical symptoms. However, as the disease progresses, it can manifest as nausea, vomiting, progressive dysphagia, and other non-specific symptoms. For instance, the patient in the current case report initially presented with dizziness, headache, and other secondary symptoms of skull metastasis.

The diagnosis of PMME should be based on the results of pathological examination. Under hematoxylin-eosin staining, melanoma cells can differ in size and shape (round, oval, or fusiform), and have visible mitosis and melanin granules in the cytoplasm. Immunohistochemistry is the main method for identifying this type of melanoma, and 3 indicators (S-100 protein, HMB-45, and Vimentin) are specific for the diagnosis of malignant melanomas. Consistent with other reports, in our patient, the diffuse expression of HMB-45, Melan-A, and S-100 was detected in tumor cells, which were negative for Cytokeratin (CK) (8).

In patients with malignant melanoma, local lymph node metastasis is known to occur first, followed by blood metastasis. The liver, lungs, and skin are the common metastatic organs (9), and the small intestine is also a common site for metastasis of melanoma due to its rich blood supply and lymph nodes (10). However, in the case reported here, no metastatic lesions were found in the patient’s liver or lungs, which presented a conundrum for our clinicians. Imaging examination plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of PMME, as it can locate the lesion, accurately detect the scope of tumor invasion, facilitate clinical staging, and aid in selecting the treatment plan. FDG-PET/CT is considered to be the most accurate technique for locating metastatic lesions of melanoma. Crippa et al. (10) found that FDG-PET/CT could detect PMME with a sensitivity of 100%, 83%, and 23% for tumors with a diameter of >1.0, 0.6–1.0, and ≤0.5 cm, respectively. In the patient we studied, the maximum diameter of the tumor was 0.8 cm, but it was negative on FDG-PET/CT imaging. The possible reasons for this include the small size of the tumor, insignificant changes in glucose metabolism, and the limited sensitivity of PET. Another reason for PMME lesions being falsely reported as negative on PET imaging in the literature is that the tumor tissue being covered by normal epithelial cells (11,12). Nevertheless, FDG-PET/CT imaging is still superior to traditional imaging modalities such as CT and MRI for the evaluation of regional lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis (13). In clinical practice, FDG-PET/CT imaging was reported to change the management of more than 20% patients and increase the metastasis detection rate by 15% (14). Furthermore, the high sensitivity of PET for asymptomatic or unresectable PMME could guide therapy (15), and one study (16) reported changes in the staging and treatment of one-quarter of patients with PMME following PET/CT imaging.

By the time symptoms manifest, patients with PMME often have distant metastasis, so their prognoses are extremely poor compared to those of patients with other esophageal malignancies. Even in the early stage of PMME, there is a strong possibility of invasion and distant metastasis (17). Without intervention, the 5-year survival rate of PMME is less than 5%, which is lower than the rate of 20% among patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. For patients without distant metastasis, surgical resection is the preferred treatment, but the average postoperative survival time is short and the 5-year survival rate is low. Radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy are treatment options for patients who have lost the opportunity for surgery, but none of them are significantly effective (18). Even though the primary esophageal lesion of the patient in our study was small, she had several distant metastases, which fully demonstrates this disease’s high degree of malignancy. Since the distant metastases were in the advanced stage, the patient was only given targeted drug therapy.


Conclusions

In summary, the diagnosis of primary malignant melanoma in body parts other than the skin is challenging, and multiple tests are needed to obtain an accurate diagnosis. When the diameter of the lesion is small, there is no significant change in the patient’s anatomy or metabolism, and the lesion does not cause visual changes; furthermore, if the tumor tissue is covered by normal epithelium and does not uptake radioactive tracer, the possibility of a false negative 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging result still exists. Therefore, in future research, efforts should be made to explore the use of new radioactive tracers to improve the detection rate of extracutaneous malignant melanomas. Nevertheless, 18F-FDG PET/CT is still superior to traditional imaging examination methods for the comprehensive and accurate evaluation of regional lymph node and distant metastasis, and can detect more metastatic foci than both CT and MRI. For the final diagnosis of PMME, the results of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging should be combined with histopathological examination.


Acknowledgments

Funding: This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81960532).


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the CARE reporting checklist. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-649

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-649). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Kibbi N, Kluger H, Choi JN. Melanoma: Clinical Presentations. Cancer Treat Res 2016;167:107-29. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Hashimoto T, Makino T, Yamasaki M, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus. Oncol Lett 2019;18:1872-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Sun H, Gong L, Zhao G, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics, staging classification, and survival outcomes of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus. J Surg Oncol 2018;117:588-96. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Chu CS, Peng CY, Chang IP, et al. Endoscopic findings in a patient with primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus: A case report. Adv Dig Med 2019;7:36-9. [Crossref]
  5. Patel P, Finger PT. Whole-body 18F FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography evaluation of patients with uveal metastasis. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:661-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Analysis of individual records for 37,513,025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 2018;391:1023-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Ortega FT, Kondo RN, Belinetti FM, et al. Primary cutaneous amelanotic melanoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor in synchronous evolution. An Bras Dermatol 2017;92:707-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Navarro-Ballester A, De Lazaro-De Molina S, Gaona-Morales J. Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Esophagus: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Am J Case Rep 2015;16:491-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Carboni F, Valle M, Giofrè M. Emergency Surgery for Small Bowel Metastasis from Melanoma: Report of Three Cases. Am Surg 2019;85:e135-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Crippa F, Leutner M, Belli F, et al. Which kinds of lymph node metastases can FDG PET detect? A clinical study in melanoma. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1491-4. [PubMed]
  11. Nakamura K, Urabe Y, Oka S, et al. A case of primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus with a widely expanded surface area. Clin J Gastroenterol 2019;12:424-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Bastiaannet E, Uyl-De Groot CA, Brouwers AH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of adding FDG-PET or CT to the diagnostic work-up of patients with stageIII melanoma. Ann Surg 2012;255:771-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Tyler DS, Onaitis M, Kherani A, et al. Positron emission tomography scanning in malignant melanoma. Cancer 2000;89:1019-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Lewin J, Sayers L, Kee D, et al. Surveillance imaging with FDG-PET/CT in the post-operative follow-up of stage 3 melanoma. Ann Oncol 2018;29:1569-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Stas M, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al. 18-FDG PET scan in the staging of recurrent melanoma: additional value and therapeutic impact. Melanoma Res 2002;12:479-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Makuuchi H, Takubo K, Yanagisawa A, et al. Esophageal malignant melanoma: analysis of 134 cases collected by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus 2015;12:158-69. [Crossref]
  17. Rathi PM, Gautam S, Sharma S. Primary Maligant Melanoma of the Oesophagus. J Assoc Physicians India 2015;63:74-5. [PubMed]
  18. Reccia I, Pisanu A, Podda M, et al. An uncommon presentation of metastatic melanoma: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e319 [Crossref] [PubMed]

(English Language Editor: J. Reynolds)

Cite this article as: Tang Y, Jiang M, Hu X, Chen C, Huang Q. Difficulties encountered in the diagnosis of primary esophageal malignant melanoma by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a case report. Ann Palliat Med 2021;10(4):4975-4981. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-649